History of the Washington Square Arch & "Exitus Acta Probat"

* Recycled entry for George Washington’s Birthday *

On each side of the famous Washington Square Arch stands George Washington in two distinct poses at its pedestal: Washington At War on the East side and Washington At Peace on the West. The Arch was designed by noted period architect Stanford White (1853-1906).

Originally built in wood for the Centennial of Washington’s inauguration in 1889, it stood half a block away. It was then commissioned in marble and completed in its current location in the early 1890’s.

Of the Washington At War statue, Emily Kies Folpe, in her book, “It Happened on Washington Square,” wrote that the sculptor, Herman A. Mac Neil, wanted the statue “to appear alert and intent, as if watching the maneuvers of his army.” Looking on are the figures of Fame and Valor.

Pictured above is Washington At Peace (A. Stirling Calder) with figures of Wisdom and Justice behind him. Wisdom stands there as “the modern Athena” – Greek goddess of wisdom. Folpe writes, “Justice, draped and crowned, holding a balanced set of scales with one hand and an open book in the other. The pages of the book are inscribed with the words Exitus acta probat.’ ”

Exitus acta probat is taken from the George Washington Family Coat of Arms. It is Latin and I’ve come across various ways of interpreting it, all similar but slight variations. The basic translation is: the outcome justifies the deed.

It’s the pairing of that statement with the figure of Justice that puzzles me. I like to think at Washington Square Park that ultimately there will be some kind of ‘Justice’ in the outcome of the redesign of the Park. Is there some missing deed?

Of course, Stanford White’s “outcome” was a little bit jarring. He was shot on the roof of the Madison Square Garden building, the second incarnation of the building (no longer there) which he also designed, by the husband of an ex-lover.

** Recently, a commenter named Hugh wrote in clarifying with the following information:

The outcome justifying the deed that Washington was referring to was the Revolutionary war. No one wanted war then, not only was it near suicide for all who opposed the English, but also, war causes a lot of death which is also something that he didn’t want, however, if the end result was freedom and liberty, then a horrible deed such as war is in fact justified. It shows that Washington believed that unless the outcome is justified, then the deed should not be done.

Piece originally published April 3, 2008; this is an edited version.

Spread the love

7 thoughts on “History of the Washington Square Arch & "Exitus Acta Probat"”

    • Hi Hank,

      Actually, that information is within this post! Perhaps you missed it. It is in the fifth paragraph. Thanks for checking out the blog and your interest!

      best,
      Cathryn

      Reply
  1. I kind of interpreted as the consequences are because of the actions. But if there is good reasoning behind the action then it is justifiable or validated.

    Reply
  2. For those not already aware, [from Wikipedia] “Washington Square Park is a public park in the Greenwich Village neighborhood of Lower Manhattan, New York City.” It is one of the best known of New York City’s public parks. Also, per the American Heraldry Society, Washington’s family motto (Exitus acta probat!) translates to “The outcome is the test of the act.” In other words, the real end (not the aim) pre-exists in the means. In still other words, the end proves whether the means were good or not. It doesn’t mean, as some would say, “the end justifies the means.” That definitely was not in George Washington’s character. More about Washington’s character at Amazon.com: George Washington’s Liberty Key: Mount Vernon’s Bastille Key (https://amazon.com/George-Washingtons-Liberty-Key-Bastille/dp/1537323377/)

    Reply
  3. I possess a water mark with the Washington Coat of Arms , inscribed with Exitus Acta Probat…the outcome justifies the deed

    Reply

Leave a Comment

%d bloggers like this: